Frothing at the Brain

On The Expectation Of Hatred

Posted by: Froth on: 6th of February, 2010

One of the ways being shunned, outcast and despised breaks you is that you expect to be hated. You go through life with the assumption that everybody you meet already hates you. Not that they will hate you if you’re not careful. There are days when I would kill to believe I can escape hatred if I’m careful. No, I have lost before I started. Everybody hates me.

The person behind the till in the corner shop hates me, and I take ten minutes to gather enough courage to go and buy a packet of crisps. The bus driver hates me, and I mumble and don’t make eye contact in the hopes that they won’t notice me. The taxi driver hates me, and I never take taxis because putting yourself in a car driven by someone who hates you is a bad idea. You, the reader, hate me. My lecturers hate me. My coursemates hate me. My housemates hate me. My vicar hates me. The stranger on the train hates me. Everybody.
Read the rest of this entry »

On The Use of Metaphors

Posted by: Froth on: 3rd of February, 2010

On Christmas morning, I was visiting my parent’s church. It used to be my church too, but I’ve moved cities since then. Little has changed.
In a desperate attempt to keep doing all the same things while they are between pastors, one of the deacons did the traditional Christmas morning show-me-your-presents slot for the children. To justify this, he tried to make a spiritual point about each present – “This doll reminds me of how God takes care of us,” and so on.

One of the children had a Transformer’s toy.

Well, I cringed. The deacon didn’t know what Transformers were, and the little lad could only explain that “they turn into cars”.

“This reminds me of how the Devil disguises himself, so we won’t recognise him.”

Um, Mr Well-meaning? The Transformers are the good guys. You could have talked about how what people look like is different from what they are inside. You could have been reminded that God, famously, works in mysterious ways and isn’t always easy to spot. But instead, you’ve upset a small child by calling his new toy car a devil.

The worst of it is, it would have been a perfectly valid point if he’d made it about the Decepticons.

Drawing lessons from popular culture is a risky business. It’s all too easy to misunderstand how fans interpret things, and any point you make must rest on the same interpretation to be well received. If you get it wrong, then fans will be too busy quarrelling with your interpretation to hear your point.

I’m not saying that there’s only valid reading of a story. Nor am I saying that only one reading can furnish good analogies. I’m saying that if you want to use popular culture to illustrate a point effectively, you had better be sure that your audience is seeing the same picture.

In Defence of Chemicals

Posted by: Froth on: 7th of January, 2010

There are two kinds of medical interventions. Well, okay, three, but the third is talking therapy and isn’t precisely medical.

There are physical interventions, and there are chemical interventions.

A physical intervention is doing something physically to the body to help it function better. It’s splinting a bone or bandaging a cut or removing an inflamed appendix. It’s massage or surgery or spectacles.

A chemical intervention is introducing one or more biologically active chemicals into the body to help it function better. It doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference what the chemicals are or where they come from or what you call them. They’re still chemicals and it’s still a chemical intervention. The only difference between herbal medicine and synthetic drugs is that herbal medicines are less predictable in content and dosage.

A drug synthesised by a weed and a drug synthesised by a factory are both equally drugs. Why do people not understand this?

Doctor Who and the Impossible Dream

Posted by: Froth on: 6th of January, 2010

I’m a part of that in-between generation. I was too young to grow up watching old Doctor Who, and by the time the new series started I was seventeen, so I’m far too old to claim to have grown up watching new Doctor Who. But of course my parents had watched it, and the BBC used to show repeats of old shows at Christmas and it’s generally part of the culture. So I knew something about it almost by osmosis. I knew there was the Doctor, and he had a scarf and companions and a Tardis that was bigger on the inside, and I knew what Daleks and Cybermen were, but I’d never really watched it. So finding out that they were, not remaking from the beginning, but actually continuing Doctor Who and I was going to get to see it, was something like hearing that London Zoo had acquired a breeding pair of unicorns.
Read the rest of this entry »

Christmas Validation

Posted by: Froth on: 25th of December, 2009

Stoking my ego is a great Christmas present. If you read and enjoyed any part of the Advent calendar, please comment here and say so, so that I will be happy and know my effort was worthwhile.

Advent Calendar – N-glucoside

Posted by: Froth on: 24th of December, 2009

Well, it’s the 24th of December, the last day of Advent. We’ve looked at some of the fundamentals of organic chemistry: bonds, functional groups, resonance (“shuffling electrons around”), aromaticity, chirality, conformation (shape) and stability, along with some other aspects of chemistry like ionic bonds and phases of matter.

Today’s molecule, to finish the adventure, is something I learned about this month which seems very appropriate for the eve of a major feast.
Read the rest of this entry »

Advent Calendar – Arsole

Posted by: Froth on: 23rd of December, 2009

Today, it’s time for something a bit silly.

The structure of arsole, a five-membered ring of carbon and arsenic with two double bonds.

This is the second-best pun in the whole of chemistry: arsole, pronounced exactly the way you think. Arsole is actually its correct systematic name. I mean, it wasn’t called that for a joke. If you apply the international naming rules, arsole is what you get for this molecule.

The ‘ars’ comes from arsenic, symbol As. Arsenic is of course poisonous, although not actually very poisonous. You need quite large doses to kill someone. It’s usually classified as a metal, but in this molecule it forms covalent bonds. Covalent bonds aren’t the preferred kind of activity for metals, which tend to favour ionic or coordination interactions. Arsenic, if you look at the periodic table, sits in the borderlands between the transition metals (iron, copper, nickel and so on) and the nonmetals (carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and their ilk). Like silicon, it’s a halfway house and can behave like either kind of thing.

The ‘ole’ part of the name comes from the double bond. It’s short for olefin, meaning ‘containing a double bond’. Alkenes and benzene rings, as we’ve seen before, contain double bonds, but because of the simplicity of them – they only have carbon in the ring – they can be more precisely classified than olefins. Alkenes are olefins, but not all olefins are alkenes.

The best pun in chemistry is a derivative of arsole in which a benzene ring is fused to one side: benzarsole.

Advent Calendar – Nicotine

Posted by: Froth on: 22nd of December, 2009

Edit: Eeep, sorry for the insufficient care and attention. The excessive picture size is fixed now.

We’ve covered two popular recreational drugs, ethanol and caffeine, so let’s look at a third. Nicotine is the major active ingredient in tobacco, and is usually ingested by burning tobacco leaves and inhaling the smoke. The nicotine is absorbed through the membranes of the mouth and throat straight into the blood stream, for an immediate effect.

The structure of nicotine, a chiral molecule based on pyridine and pyrrolidine rings.

Nicotine is highly addictive and very hard to shake a dependency to. Unlike caffeine, to which you can form a dependence within a week but lose that dependency just as fast, giving up nicotine takes months of determination.

There are numerous products on the market designed to ease the addiction-shaking process. These all work in the same basic fashion. A dose of nicotine is administered, to be absorbed through the skin or the membranes of the mouth, without the accompanying tobacco. This way you can lessen the cravings without surrendering to the temptation to smoke.

My own suspicion is that these non-smoking nicotine sources only help some people. Remember, it’s the nicotine that’s addictive, not the smoke, so the aids are addictive too. For some people, gritting their teeth and going cold turkey is likely to work best. For others, gradual dosage reduction will be easier.

It’s also worth noting that, nicotine aside, smoking is really bad for your health. Nothing that fills your lungs up with tar is good for you. Transferring a nicotine addiction to patches or gum rather than smoke will be good for your health even if you can’t shake the addiction itself.

Advent Calendar – Silicon Dioxide

Posted by: Froth on: 21st of December, 2009

Yesterday we took a whirlwind tour through liquid crystals. Today, let us consider another strange phase of matter – glass.

Technically speaking, ‘glass’ is actually the name of a phase just like ’solid’ and ‘gas’ are phases, but in common usage glass means a mixture composed mainly of silicon dioxide.

Silicon dioxide, often referred to simply as ’silica’, is what chemists call “isoelectronic” with carbon dioxide. It has the same number of electrons in equivalent orbitals, because silicon sits just below carbon in the Periodic Table. It’s in the same group, so has some of the same properties. But silicon dioxide is a solid at the surface temperatures of Earth. It makes up the vast majority of the Earth’s rocks, and therefore of the Earth.

Glass isn’t, as is commonly thought, a supercooled liquid. It’s a non-crystalline solid. Silica takes on a lot of forms, including several crystalline arrangements, and glass is its amorphous solid form. It’s both brittle and rigid, so it really can’t be considered a liquid. It doesn’t have a normal phase transition when it melts – it looks like a continuous softening rather than a distinct transition to liquid – which is where the confusion comes in.

Crystals form when a material cools and becomes a solid. In effect, the material freezes. But crystals aren’t all the same size. The faster you cool something, the smaller the crystals will be, which is why ice-cream made very fast is the best kind. If you cool some things, like silica, fast enough the crystals are so small they don’t exist.  Molecules have to arrange themselves in strict order to make crystals and if you cool them fast enough, they don’t have time to line themselves up before they’re too cold to do it. The resulting solid is non-crystalline – in some cases, it’s a glass.

Advent Calendar – Liquid Crystals

Posted by: Froth on: 20th of December, 2009

The structure of 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl

This is 4-cyano-4′-pentylbiphenyl, and it’s a liquid crystal.

Now, to cover liquid crystals properly would take up another Advent’s worth of posts, so I’m not going to. I’m going to simplify things horribly. I’m going to tell you lies-to-readers, in the same way that teachers tell lies-to-children. I know it’s not precisely correct, and you know it’s not precisely correct, but it will serve to get the basic concepts across.
Read the rest of this entry »